Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
An evaluation of the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) division, conducted between December 2023 and January 2025, revealed inconsistencies in the agency’s adherence to established guidelines regarding the seizure and holding of cryptocurrency assets in criminal cases. This assessment highlights areas where improvements are needed to ensure consistent and compliant handling of digital assets within the IRS-CI’s investigative procedures.
The evaluation focused on various aspects of the crypto asset seizure and holding process, including the initial seizure protocols, the secure storage of seized cryptocurrencies, the valuation methodologies used to determine the assets’ worth, and the procedures for managing and ultimately disposing of the assets after legal proceedings conclude. Discrepancies were found across all these areas.
In some instances, investigators failed to properly document the seizure process, leading to potential evidentiary challenges and difficulties in tracking the assets’ chain of custody. This lack of thorough documentation raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the seizure records.
Furthermore, the evaluation highlighted inconsistencies in the methods used to secure and store seized cryptocurrencies. While IRS-CI utilizes secure storage solutions for certain cases, the evaluation found inconsistencies in the application of these solutions across different cases and investigative teams. The lack of standardized procedures created vulnerabilities that could lead to loss, theft, or unauthorized access to the seized assets.
The valuation of seized cryptocurrencies also proved to be a significant area of concern. The evaluation identified inconsistencies in the methods used to determine the fair market value of the assets at the time of seizure, potentially impacting the accuracy of asset forfeiture calculations. The lack of standardized valuation practices could result in inaccuracies that could have legal and financial ramifications.
Finally, the evaluation pointed out inconsistencies in the post-seizure procedures, including the methods used to manage and dispose of the seized assets after the conclusion of legal proceedings. This raises concerns about the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the IRS-CI’s handling of seized cryptocurrencies.
The findings of this evaluation underscore the need for comprehensive improvements within the IRS-CI’s procedures for handling cryptocurrency assets. These improvements should encompass clearer guidelines, standardized procedures, enhanced training for investigators, and the implementation of robust security protocols to ensure the secure, compliant, and efficient handling of digital assets in criminal investigations. The future effectiveness of the IRS-CI in tackling cryptocurrency-related crime depends on addressing these critical deficiencies.
