News done fearlessly
To connect a sign in method the email must match the one on your Crikey account.
Contact us on: support@crikey.com.au
‘na i actually painted over it because it gives more value to the nft,’ artist Peter Seaton wrote in a now-deleted Instagram comment.
Sep 12, 2022
4
The Melbourne artist behind a controversial mural depicting a Russian and Ukrainian soldier hugging says he painted over the artwork to increase its value as an NFT.
Last week, artist Peter Seaton, who works under the name CTO, removed a three-storey mural titled “Peace Before Pieces” in South Melbourne following widespread criticism.
Ukraine’s ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, labelled it offensive for promoting “a sense of a false equivalency between the victim and the aggressor”.
News done fearlessly. Join us today and save 50%.
1/ A recently unveiled mural in @Melbourne showing a RU and a UA soldier hugging is utterly offensive to all Ukrainians. The painter has no clue about the RU invasion of Ukraine and it is disappointing to see it done without consulting the Ukrainian community in Melbourne. pic.twitter.com/TCG6s7W9SJ
Seaton continued to sell 12 digital artworks featuring the mural as non-fungible tokens (NFTs), with profits going to global anti-war organisation World Beyond War.
Following the mural’s removal, Seaton apologised to the Ukrainian community but defended his artwork. “There is an element of war which is about dehumanising the opposition. My artwork was only about bringing the human element to both of these warring factions,” he told The Age shortly after removing the mural.
But after painting over the mural, Seaton continued to post content to social media in defence of his work.
In a video shared on the artist’s Instagram — in which he claimed the “mob” of Ukrainian critics of the mural were ashamed by their participation in war — Seated said his motivation for painting over the artwork was to juice the value of his digital artworks.
let me response u last time，cus its getting boring.
What @ctoart1 experience is called criticism，he did not paint over his mural due to any enforcement.
It is a dangerous move to mix criticism with censorship，because it leads society to silence for hypocritical politeness. https://t.co/TqR5bevSrL pic.twitter.com/zrNCCR4W48
“na i actually painted over it because it gives more value to the nft,” he wrote in a now-deleted comment.
Mural artists have embraced NFTs as a way to preserve and monetise their work. Murals are ephemeral due to their public nature; sometimes they’re painted over by their creator or, more often, by others. Now, artists can sell digital, unique versions of their real-life work that last beyond the physical creation.
Seaton told Crikey that increasing value was just one of three reasons he painted over his work. He also said that the artwork was graffitied in Ukrainian, and that he didn’t want to hurt people.
“It’s their perception of the work that has hurt them. Because it’s a CLEAR SYMBOL OF PEACE to most people,” he said.
Of the collection’s five NFTs that have been purchased so far, two sold since the mural was painted over. All five sold for US$139.82.
The best way to support independent media is to become a member.
You can join us through our 50% off sale using promo code LETTERS. Or, if you have the means and want to help us even more (thank you!), you can take out a full price annual membership. It really makes a difference.
Cam Wilson
Associate Editor @cameronwilson
Cam Wilson is Crikey‘s associate editor. He previously worked as a reporter at the ABC, BuzzFeed, Business Insider and Gizmodo. He primarily covers internet culture and tech in Australia.
Queen Elizabeth NFT prices are skyrocketing as thousands of listings flood the marketplace
Technology
Sep 09, 2022
3
A new asset class is rapidly emerging. It may well be art but it ain’t about the artists
Society
Mar 12, 2021
5
The era of magical thinking: what does the rise of NFTs say about our culture and economy?
Culture
Feb 15, 2022
18
NFT: Nonsensical Financial Transaction
Yes, advocating for peace is controversial. Advocating for war is not. Groupthink.
Correct Harry. Tells us comething about our society – War at all costs.
This is just Capitalism in action. I applaud the artist’s marketing/promotional skills. What do you expect?
Copyright © 2022 Crikey
Just fill out the fields below and we’ll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.
